11 Comments

I don’t understand the biochemistry at all, but “eyes are used as primary interface” resonates with me.

When I was doing spelunking (2020, 2021), I was disconnecting the link. The interesting part is, upon exiting the cave, I was feeling this unexpected huge pressure and tiredness of the eyes and the muscles around the eyes, that would last two hours.

Expand full comment

Shawn, please advise...

Are refectacles, (they look to be in the green spectrum) the same you'd use when using red light therapy. I have them and they look almost identical, but you also need the mirroring effect as well.

Am I correct on this detail? Would they be able to make them into readers? Is that possible, would I really need a script, just for that? I can see this is an important thing to choose but the info isn't clear to me. Should I write them direct or would you know. Thank you.

Also, Daniel of Ba'al Busters had an interview with Dr. Monzo, on Rumble. They were hinting that Garden of Life is full of contaminants such as heavy metals, Mike Adams did some work on it to confirm... Doesn't Dr, Len Bur have some ownership in the company? Just wondering.

Expand full comment

Len Ber does not have ownership in Garden Of Life from what I found out, however Garden of Life is under NOW pharmaceuticals which Len was a VP for and a supplement s scientist who wrote papers on endocytosis (clathrin) and adjuvants (graphene oxide).

https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2023/11/27/len-ber-knows-which-means-len-ber-lies/

Expand full comment

Hello M'Dear.

I've been in dialog with the maker of Reflectacles. He's responsive, although prefers to spend most of his time in the woods of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, so it might take a few days for a response. He's not too keen on being with tech, as you might imagine.

I ordered the "goggles", which I'm hoping will fit over my readers.

I inquired as to what the differences are in his specs and here was his response. Hope you find it helpful.

"There really is no 'best' model. They each have their own strengths. It would be in your best interest to understand how each work and then determine which pair would work best for your situations. Let me try to illustrate this.

IRpair and IRcloak work with the special infrared absorbing lenses alone and do not reflect infrared like the Ghost and Phantom models. These lenses turn black on cameras using infrared for illumination, and also block 3d infrared sensing/mapping from being able to read your eye measurements. They both look just like an average pair of sunglasses to our eyes.

Phantom uses the IR absorbing lenses and additionally only reflects infrared light. They will block 3D IR facial mapping (e.g. Face ID) during both day and night. In low light situations they will also blur the face on security cameras using IR for illumination. Since they do not reflect visible light, they look like a regular black pair of frames to our eyes.

Ghost uses the IR absorbing lenses and also reflects both visible and infrared light. They will block 3D IR facial mapping (e.g. Face ID) during both day and night. In low light situations they will also blur the face on security cameras using IR for illumination and when photos are taken on a phone with a visible light flash. Since they do reflect visible light, they tend to sparkle in sunlight or from ambient lamps which makes them stand out a bit."

Here's his email: reflectacles@protonmail.com

Expand full comment

This is great, thank you for adding this to the comment section. More detail than I was even aware. I love my Ghost.

Expand full comment

I think I'll get the goggles too. This has really been challenging to know what we're needing for this future surveillance and I'm with this Reflectacles guy, best not to get too close to tech, since it's not good for one's health.

I appreciate your effort, seems important to discuss further.

Thanks again!

Expand full comment

I like the goggles a lot because they can be used alone or over readers or prescription glasses. They take a bit of getting used to, but WOW, what a difference. I have little to no fatigue. I will be getting the miasma line for wearing out to disrupt facial ID, but Chris of Reflectacles is still waiting on the manufacturer of the frame overlay to start manufacturing them again. He's saying not until the end of summer.

Expand full comment

Are the goggles hearty enough? Do you think the quality is up to snuff, as I'd seen the adjustable feature and was thinking it would be only a matter of time before it breaks, given the need to use them often, daily. Chin A has taken over most objects building in the breaking feature, needing replacement after 1000 shots, then the beebee gun is purposely calculated to break. Thank heavens for homegrown capabilities here. Thanks for the report.

Expand full comment

Hi Rauwolfia.

Sorry I'm answering this so late. I'm wearing my "goggles" as we speak. I LOVE them. The adjustability is very good and the "joints" super-sturdy. Because they're pretty large and I wear them all the time when on computer, phone or watching the boob toob, I do find I need to wash them every few days with a bit of dish soap. They also come in a very nice silky bag for travel.

I'm getting a second pair with the dark lenses for when I'm out in the field amongst the hoi-polloi.

I'll admit to being hugely curious about your, ahem, "homegrown" capabilities"! :)

Expand full comment

Len is part of a lawsuit for targeted ppl of electromagnetic weapons. He talks a ton about nanotech in the blood. I had no idea he had ownership in that, how interesting…

Expand full comment

Shawn, you had mentioned at one point that after wearing your reflectacles, you noticed you were able to see through the "bull" a little better. Were you being facetious, or serious, in that you were getting less photonic interference or something like that? Less of the manipulative input?

Expand full comment