When it comes to COVID-19 origin stories, hindsight has been anything but 20/20. Recently, the myth about China being the sole developer of the SARS-CoV-2 sequence has reappeared. It reappears like so many things in Media, to keep us divided.
Ah, yes, you again. Round and round with the "no virus" broken record... Or perhaps more appropriately, a glitch in the matrix.
The NWO scientists have absolutely infected you with a mind virus, and are quite happy that you have no clue what they are doing and publish papers that help to keep them cloaked. You are one of the few to continue with bot sytle posting on my pages, and if it makes you feel better, by all means continue.
My case is made, challenge it on merit or leave it.
Then why don't You prove what I offer in My article untrue? If You have the evidence, please show the isolation, the purification, the images of the genomes, and where contagion has been proven honestly (Pasteur admitted in His posthumously published journals that He had to add mercury to what He used to "prove" it...).
I am willing to shift My stance when I have verifiable evidence, but given over 200 agencies worldwide (including but not limited to the CDC, the NHS, and more) have returned FOI requests for isolates of SARS-Cov2 with admittance that They have nothing...
So far what I have seen of Your "case" is mere claims made by the Ones in on the (apparent) deception.
Good grief, I've published 668 pages and over 1600 footnotes on this thesis. It's pretty clear where I stand on this subject. I Just don't understand why some people like yourself troll other peoples pages and demand they answer to you. I am most certainly not going to get into some "viral like particle" vs "proteins" symantics that I am sure you will also bitch and complain about.
Our team predicted accurately what types of diseases would aride when we first analysed the sequence provided by the Chinese Military in December 2019 . We also confirmed it was the same sequence patented by Moderna in 2016 that was provided by Fauci's Fort Detrick in 2015. We warned people then that this sequence must not ever be put into a jab.
Here., let me provide you with another article to ignore...
Fair enough. I have unsubscribed. Do have a lovely life!
(Looked over that bit and it starts with the presumption of a virus. Begging the question why zero institutions so far have anything to offer the FOI requests... But You needn't worry Your head about it.)
Shawn, I am saddened to read your immature, reactionary response to Amaterasu Solar.
First, I find this person to be genuine and not passive aggressive.
Second, I would have thought — despite what I, too, consider to be your incorrect and unsubstantiated belief about the existence "disease-causing" "contagious" "viruses" whether lab-created OR in nature — that you were a real warrior, able to engage in civil discourse, *especially* when perspectives diverge so extremely, and even when you view your conversation partner as rude. In other words, a simple "As you wish" reply would have been neutral and taking the high road, rather than offering only the smug aggression of a third-grader.
In conclusion, when someone challenges your IDEAS, they are not attacking YOU, so there is no reason for reacting belligerently. Such bellicosity has, indeed, become part of the mind-virus which is fomenting divisiveness between us. The wayward wizards and their cushy-job-keeping career clowns have indoctrinated in us this egotistical war-mongering, and it serves only them, not us.
Nobody is violently responding to you and you know it. I've posted over 100 articles since September. You've posted your belief under at least half of them. I have responded to you pleasantly in both comments and articles. At this point, I don't have to care about what you say. You are using other people's work to push your material which is ridiculous. You have unsubscribed but you will not leave.
Covid as a virus does not exist so it is only a bioweapon as propaganda, there is no scientific paper finding a virus from a sick person as a purified isolate, proven to be a pathogen with a non-patient control. It’s time to learn something about virology: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Bioweapon-BS:b
Not unless you are looking at a prion with inherent genetic information passed on from the mRNA vaccine...voila! You now have a viral-like pathogen!! When is a virus not a virus? When its a prion!
Prions: These infectious agents were originally believed to be anomalous viruses, hence their inclusion here. However, they consist solely of protein, with no enclosed nucleic acid. Thus, they are definitely not viruses despite sharing the superficial properties of size and infectiousness. Unlike other infectious agents, such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi, prions do not contain genetic materials such as DNA or RNA. The unique traits and genetic information of prions are believed to be encoded within the conformational structure and posttranslational modifications of the proteins... proteins that misfold due to 5G FREQUENCIES!! (Gauss Theorum)
Well the mRNA vaccine had viral (MERS, HIV) inserts and bacterial inserts (Luciferase, Bacteriorhodopsin)... of course it wasn't a typical virus because it was a Bioweapon! A Bioweapon that produced what the media calls "spike proteins" which are in fact "PRION PROTEINS"..... so what Shawn calls a virus he refers to the Biowepon itself.
The only novel “viruses” that exist in nature are the ones that are secretly.. manufactured by a complex computer model in government controlled bio labs that require “vaccines” manufactured by government controlled pharmaceutical companies who aren’t required to reveal the ingredients of the vaccines and have complete impunity against any health issues, sickness and death once administered.
Why is this a default comment by so many Substack edgelords? I just think many of you just want to hear yourself talk.
I discuss genetic material that behaves like a kymera upon infection. A biological neural "chip". I discuss the programs that developed this biological malware. When did I invite "no virus" debate?
For what it’s worth, I am not a true believer in germ theory either. I believe that if science wasn’t being conducted by consensus, virology and epidemiology would be proven to be pseudoscience. I don’t believe that bona fide science is being conducted anymore, with hypotheses needing to be tested and verified and falsified against alternative hypotheses and against the null hypothesis. I believe that we now have science-as-dogma, which germ theory is an example of, aka ideological science or scientism.
I’m extremely grateful for the work of the Perth Group and for the work of Dr’s Sam and Mark Bailey (and their many cohorts), who have opened my eyes to the anti-scientific assumptions which form the foundation of virology.
It’s really not worth getting into the specifics. When it comes to dogma, most people’s minds are as closed as a steel trap. Something majorly critical has to happen to a person to get him or her to even begin to question his or her dogmas, ESPECIALLY in the scientific versus pseudoscientific realms. It’s the same thing with anthropogenic global warming.
I challenged the theory that Neanderthal males breed with human woman and had prodigy and then had all hell thrown at me in Google Forums they have since hide the things . But anyway I guess they didn’t want egg on their face so no more open discussions the
This article is about USA, China, Canada and France conspiring to produce the SARS-CoV-2 sequence, and you post here about a bad experience you had on Google forums?! What is wrong with you people?!
Bona fide science is about challenging theories. Theories exist to be disproven, not to be treated as dogma requiring consensus. (But I’m not a scientist, so what do I know?)
Amateurs admits she does not read my articles. Many of which address the "no virus" narrative. She has posted her material under at least half of the over 100 articles I've posted since September. She does not read my work. Her appearance here is unethical. She has no scientific "morality", and I don't have to put up with it.
In that respect, Amateurs has become an unwanted guest. I have lost my patience at this point, that is for sure. My comment section is open for debate, but her hundreds of posts on my Substack, with demands that I address every one is ridiculous. Her comments here are in many ways invalid, she has said she does not read my articles, and I can see through analytics that she has never opened a single footnote there are 668 pages and over 1609 footnotes in my thesis, I am surely not going to continue to respond to someone who is spamming my comment sections without ever reading the content
“there are 668 pages and over 1609 footnotes in my thesis”
For my benefit, what’s your working thesis? As clearly and as succinctly as you can. Thanks.
It’s my understanding that a thesis statement isn’t overly complicated. The complicated part is attempting to prove — i.e. provide the necessary and sufficient evidence in support of — one’s thesis statement. A thesis statement must be able to be tested and verified and falsified.
Maybe on some high power level, there’s collaboration among the CCP and the Russian state and NATO and the European Union and the Five Eyes (the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand). If so, such Machiavellian machinations would be unknown to the commoners. But the commoners would require the semblance of enemies — both foreign and domestic. Hence, the formation of political parties (domestically) and international alliances. Or maybe there will be full blown warfare between NATO and a Russo-Sino alliance. Or maybe there will be a full blown war between Islam and the Zionist regime of Israel, with different nation-states choosing sides,
Ah, yes, you again. Round and round with the "no virus" broken record... Or perhaps more appropriately, a glitch in the matrix.
The NWO scientists have absolutely infected you with a mind virus, and are quite happy that you have no clue what they are doing and publish papers that help to keep them cloaked. You are one of the few to continue with bot sytle posting on my pages, and if it makes you feel better, by all means continue.
My case is made, challenge it on merit or leave it.
Then why don't You prove what I offer in My article untrue? If You have the evidence, please show the isolation, the purification, the images of the genomes, and where contagion has been proven honestly (Pasteur admitted in His posthumously published journals that He had to add mercury to what He used to "prove" it...).
I am willing to shift My stance when I have verifiable evidence, but given over 200 agencies worldwide (including but not limited to the CDC, the NHS, and more) have returned FOI requests for isolates of SARS-Cov2 with admittance that They have nothing...
So far what I have seen of Your "case" is mere claims made by the Ones in on the (apparent) deception.
Good grief, I've published 668 pages and over 1600 footnotes on this thesis. It's pretty clear where I stand on this subject. I Just don't understand why some people like yourself troll other peoples pages and demand they answer to you. I am most certainly not going to get into some "viral like particle" vs "proteins" symantics that I am sure you will also bitch and complain about.
Our team predicted accurately what types of diseases would aride when we first analysed the sequence provided by the Chinese Military in December 2019 . We also confirmed it was the same sequence patented by Moderna in 2016 that was provided by Fauci's Fort Detrick in 2015. We warned people then that this sequence must not ever be put into a jab.
Here., let me provide you with another article to ignore...
https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2021/07/26/gain-of-function-experiments-2-the-sars-cov-2-hiv-1-story/
Fair enough. I have unsubscribed. Do have a lovely life!
(Looked over that bit and it starts with the presumption of a virus. Begging the question why zero institutions so far have anything to offer the FOI requests... But You needn't worry Your head about it.)
I humbly cherish you unsubscribing... do let the door hit your passive aggressive ass on the way out.
Shawn, I am saddened to read your immature, reactionary response to Amaterasu Solar.
First, I find this person to be genuine and not passive aggressive.
Second, I would have thought — despite what I, too, consider to be your incorrect and unsubstantiated belief about the existence "disease-causing" "contagious" "viruses" whether lab-created OR in nature — that you were a real warrior, able to engage in civil discourse, *especially* when perspectives diverge so extremely, and even when you view your conversation partner as rude. In other words, a simple "As you wish" reply would have been neutral and taking the high road, rather than offering only the smug aggression of a third-grader.
In conclusion, when someone challenges your IDEAS, they are not attacking YOU, so there is no reason for reacting belligerently. Such bellicosity has, indeed, become part of the mind-virus which is fomenting divisiveness between us. The wayward wizards and their cushy-job-keeping career clowns have indoctrinated in us this egotistical war-mongering, and it serves only them, not us.
I wish you well.
Don't address facts, and keep shilling for the liars. I am sure the door will not hit Your passive aggressive ass. So not to worry.
Spot on regarding “the twin towers of lies Rockefeller taught Us as truth: viruses and contagion.” 🎯🎯
🙏🏻💜🙏🏻
I’m concerned that viruses and contagion are being increasingly treated as unassailable dogma. If these dogmas are challenged, it’s met violently.
Indeed, I have noticed!
Nobody is violently responding to you and you know it. I've posted over 100 articles since September. You've posted your belief under at least half of them. I have responded to you pleasantly in both comments and articles. At this point, I don't have to care about what you say. You are using other people's work to push your material which is ridiculous. You have unsubscribed but you will not leave.
Covid as a virus does not exist so it is only a bioweapon as propaganda, there is no scientific paper finding a virus from a sick person as a purified isolate, proven to be a pathogen with a non-patient control. It’s time to learn something about virology: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Bioweapon-BS:b
Not unless you are looking at a prion with inherent genetic information passed on from the mRNA vaccine...voila! You now have a viral-like pathogen!! When is a virus not a virus? When its a prion!
Prions: These infectious agents were originally believed to be anomalous viruses, hence their inclusion here. However, they consist solely of protein, with no enclosed nucleic acid. Thus, they are definitely not viruses despite sharing the superficial properties of size and infectiousness. Unlike other infectious agents, such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi, prions do not contain genetic materials such as DNA or RNA. The unique traits and genetic information of prions are believed to be encoded within the conformational structure and posttranslational modifications of the proteins... proteins that misfold due to 5G FREQUENCIES!! (Gauss Theorum)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173489/#:~:text=Finally%2C%20we%20discuss%20prions.,properties%20of%20size%20and%20infectiousness.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978610/#
Well said. I believe infectious diseases to be bacteria, parasites and fungus.
Well the mRNA vaccine had viral (MERS, HIV) inserts and bacterial inserts (Luciferase, Bacteriorhodopsin)... of course it wasn't a typical virus because it was a Bioweapon! A Bioweapon that produced what the media calls "spike proteins" which are in fact "PRION PROTEINS"..... so what Shawn calls a virus he refers to the Biowepon itself.
Good to know this; thanks for sharing.
The only novel “viruses” that exist in nature are the ones that are secretly.. manufactured by a complex computer model in government controlled bio labs that require “vaccines” manufactured by government controlled pharmaceutical companies who aren’t required to reveal the ingredients of the vaccines and have complete impunity against any health issues, sickness and death once administered.
Why is this a default comment by so many Substack edgelords? I just think many of you just want to hear yourself talk.
I discuss genetic material that behaves like a kymera upon infection. A biological neural "chip". I discuss the programs that developed this biological malware. When did I invite "no virus" debate?
For what it’s worth, I am not a true believer in germ theory either. I believe that if science wasn’t being conducted by consensus, virology and epidemiology would be proven to be pseudoscience. I don’t believe that bona fide science is being conducted anymore, with hypotheses needing to be tested and verified and falsified against alternative hypotheses and against the null hypothesis. I believe that we now have science-as-dogma, which germ theory is an example of, aka ideological science or scientism.
I’m extremely grateful for the work of the Perth Group and for the work of Dr’s Sam and Mark Bailey (and their many cohorts), who have opened my eyes to the anti-scientific assumptions which form the foundation of virology.
It’s really not worth getting into the specifics. When it comes to dogma, most people’s minds are as closed as a steel trap. Something majorly critical has to happen to a person to get him or her to even begin to question his or her dogmas, ESPECIALLY in the scientific versus pseudoscientific realms. It’s the same thing with anthropogenic global warming.
I challenged the theory that Neanderthal males breed with human woman and had prodigy and then had all hell thrown at me in Google Forums they have since hide the things . But anyway I guess they didn’t want egg on their face so no more open discussions the
This article is about USA, China, Canada and France conspiring to produce the SARS-CoV-2 sequence, and you post here about a bad experience you had on Google forums?! What is wrong with you people?!
Bona fide science is about challenging theories. Theories exist to be disproven, not to be treated as dogma requiring consensus. (But I’m not a scientist, so what do I know?)
Amateurs admits she does not read my articles. Many of which address the "no virus" narrative. She has posted her material under at least half of the over 100 articles I've posted since September. She does not read my work. Her appearance here is unethical. She has no scientific "morality", and I don't have to put up with it.
Your comments section is symbolic of your own home. Those who comment here ought to treat you and this place to post with dignity and respect.
In that respect, Amateurs has become an unwanted guest. I have lost my patience at this point, that is for sure. My comment section is open for debate, but her hundreds of posts on my Substack, with demands that I address every one is ridiculous. Her comments here are in many ways invalid, she has said she does not read my articles, and I can see through analytics that she has never opened a single footnote there are 668 pages and over 1609 footnotes in my thesis, I am surely not going to continue to respond to someone who is spamming my comment sections without ever reading the content
“there are 668 pages and over 1609 footnotes in my thesis”
For my benefit, what’s your working thesis? As clearly and as succinctly as you can. Thanks.
It’s my understanding that a thesis statement isn’t overly complicated. The complicated part is attempting to prove — i.e. provide the necessary and sufficient evidence in support of — one’s thesis statement. A thesis statement must be able to be tested and verified and falsified.
I totally agree with you that the WHO was the engineer of the man-made bio lab virus manufactured in China, Canada and USA.
Maybe on some high power level, there’s collaboration among the CCP and the Russian state and NATO and the European Union and the Five Eyes (the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand). If so, such Machiavellian machinations would be unknown to the commoners. But the commoners would require the semblance of enemies — both foreign and domestic. Hence, the formation of political parties (domestically) and international alliances. Or maybe there will be full blown warfare between NATO and a Russo-Sino alliance. Or maybe there will be a full blown war between Islam and the Zionist regime of Israel, with different nation-states choosing sides,
SHAWN HI
Thanks please see my questions last post