7 Comments

Only psychopaths would think They have a right to tinker with other sentient sapient life. I give no consent to that mess, and I do not doubt that Most, if fully informed, would not either. So They manufacture "implied consent" by "telling" Us things in obscure and esoteric ways and then claim "implied consent" when We do not say "NO!" Never mind that, to be Ethical, We must be fully informed of all pertinent data in clear, concise, and open fashion before "implied consent" can be claimed.

The psychopaths in control would best be solved for.

Solving for Psychopaths in Control (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/solving-for-psychopaths-in-control

The Simplicity of Ethics (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-simplicity-of-ethics

Expand full comment

Every time I decide we are living in a Simulation, I revert back to Nature, and say it just can't be true. This in-form a shun... proves that Nature is TRUE reality, and this A.I. system is replicating it..

Expand full comment

Obviously people are still using their devices, TV etc. They say addictions can be treated within 30 days? Would this be possible if people went off the grid completely? Might that reverse this process?

Expand full comment

no more tv, and no more sweets

you are not allowed any tweets

the internet is done

no more fun in the Sun!!!

This is fascinating Thank you Shawn Paul Melville

Expand full comment

Vital I.A. no interesting name don't you think? I like the last part of it best!

Expand full comment

Dont think they want cyborgs. xenoorganisms with data/tech control. just read xenobiology -a new form of life as the ultimate biosafety tool.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, the hacking is purely biological. SARS-CoV-2 is biological malware.

Expand full comment